-
1.
Subjects suffering from bipolar disorder taking lithium are less likely to report physical pain: a FACE-BD study.
Risch, N, Dubois, J, Etain, B, Aouizerate, B, Bellivier, F, Belzeaux, R, Dubertret, C, Haffen, E, Januel, D, Leboyer, M, et al
European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists. 2023;(1):e8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical pain is a common issue in people with bipolar disorder (BD). It worsens mental health and quality of life, negatively impacts treatment response, and increases the risk of suicide. Lithium, which is prescribed in BD as a mood stabilizer, has shown promising effects on pain. METHODS This naturalistic study included 760 subjects with BD ( FACE-BD cohort) divided in two groups: with and without self-reported pain (evaluated with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire). In this sample, 176 subjects were treated with lithium salts. The objectives of the study were to determine whether patients receiving lithium reported less pain, and whether this effect was associated with the recommended mood-stabilizing blood concentration of lithium. RESULTS Subjects with lithium intake were less likely to report pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.95; p = 0.036) after controlling for sociodemographic variables, BD type, lifetime history of psychiatric disorders, suicide attempt, personality traits, current depression and anxiety levels, sleep quality, and psychomotor activity. Subjects taking lithium were even less likely to report pain when lithium concentration in blood was ≥0.5 mmol/l (OR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.24-0.79; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS This is the first naturalistic study to show lithium's promising effect on pain in subjects suffering from BD after controlling for many confounding variables. This analgesic effect seems independent of BD severity and comorbid conditions. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the analgesic effect of lithium salts and to determine whether lithium decreases pain in other vulnerable populations.
-
2.
Comparative analysis of anticholinergic burden scales to explain iatrogenic cognitive impairment and self-reported side effects in the euthymic phase of bipolar disorders: Results from the FACE-BD cohort.
Vidal, N, Brunet-Gouet, E, Frileux, S, Aouizerate, B, Aubin, V, Belzeaux, R, Courtet, P, D'Amato, T, Dubertret, C, Etain, B, et al
European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023;:67-79
Abstract
Bipolar disorders (BD) are characterized by cognitive impairment during the euthymic phase, to which treatments can contribute. The anticholinergic properties of medications, i.e., the ability of a treatment to inhibit cholinergic receptors, are associated with cognitive impairment in elderly patients and people with schizophrenia but this association has not been well characterized in individuals with remitted BD. Moreover, the validity of only one anticholinergic burden scale designed to assess the anticholinergic load of medications has been tested in BD. In a literature review, we identified 31 existing scales. We first measured the associations between 27 out of the 31 scales and objective cognitive impairment in bivariable regressions. We then adjusted the bivariable models with covariates: the scales significantly associated with cognitive impairment in bivariable and multiple logistic regressions were defined as having good concurrent validity to assess cognitive impairment. In a sample of 2,031 individuals with euthymic BD evaluated with a neuropsychological battery, two scales had good concurrent validity to assess cognitive impairment, whereas chlorpromazine equivalents, lorazepam equivalents, the number of antipsychotics, or the number of treatments had not. Finally, similar analyses with subjective anticholinergic side-effects as outcome variables reported 14 scales with good concurrent validity to assess self-reported peripheral anticholinergic side-effects and 13 to assess self-reported central anticholinergic side-effects. Thus, we identified valid scales to monitor the anticholinergic burden in BD, which may be useful in estimating iatrogenic cognitive impairment in studies investigating cognition in BD.
-
3.
EMDR for symptoms of depression, stress and burnout in health care workers exposed to COVID-19 (HARD): A study protocol for a trial within a cohort study.
Caille, A, Allemang-Trivalle, A, Blanchin, M, Rebion, A, Sauvaget, A, Gohier, B, Birmes, P, Bui, E, Fakra, E, Krebs, MO, et al
European journal of psychotraumatology. 2023;(1):2179569
Abstract
Background: Stressful events during a pandemic are a major cause of serious health problems, such as burnout, depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among health care workers (HCWs). During three years, HCWs, on the frontline to fight the COVID-19 pandemic, have been at an increased risk of high levels of stress, anxiety, depression, burnout and PTSD. Regarding potential psychological interventions, Eye Movement Desensitization & Reprocessing (EMDR) is a structured, strongly recommended therapy based on its well-known efficacy in reducing PTSD symptoms and anxiety.Objectives: This study, designed as a trial within a cohort (TwiC), aims to 1) estimate the prevalence of depression, burnout and PTSD in a sample of HCWs after experiencing the COVID-19 emergency (cohort part) and 2) assess the efficacy and acceptability of 'EMDR + usual care' for HCWs from the cohort who report significant psychological symptoms (trial part).Methods: The study, designed as a TwiC, consists of a prospective cohort study (n = 3000) with an embedded, pragmatic, randomized open-label superiority trial with two groups (n = 900). Participants included in the trial part are HCWs recruited for the cohort with significant symptoms on at least one psychological dimension (depression, burnout, PTSD) at baseline, 3 months or 6 months, determined by using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale, and PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5). The intervention consists of 12 separate EMDR sessions with a certified therapist. The control group receives usual care. The trial has three primary outcomes: changes in depression, burnout and PTSD scores from randomization to 6 months. All participants are followed up for 12 months.Conclusions: This study provides empirical evidence about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the mental health burden it places on HCWs and assesses the effectiveness of EMDR as a psychological intervention.Trial registration NCT04570202.
-
4.
Low omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids predict reduced response to standard antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder.
Cussotto, S, Delgado, I, Oriolo, G, Kemper, J, Begarie, D, Dexpert, S, Sauvant, J, Leboyer, M, Aouizerate, B, Martin-Santos, R, et al
Depression and anxiety. 2022
-
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability, and antidepressant drug treatment is only effective in over half of patients with a high prevalence of treatment resistance. The importance of nutrition in mental health is gaining recognition. Omega-3 is an essential polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vital for anti-inflammatory processes and brain integrity. In the absence of the body's ability to make Omega-3, it or its precursors must be acquired from the diet. Yet altered metabolic pathways can hamper the process and the adequate balance with PUFA Omega‐6 is also crucial, as elevated levels of Omega-6 are linked to several diseases. An extensive amount of research suggests that higher Omega-3 levels reduce the occurrence of depression. Yet results using just Omega-3s for depression have been varied. This European-wide study sought to investigate how the PUFA status could affect the clinical response to treatment with antidepressants. 60-adults with an average age of 41 with major depressive disorders received antidepressive treatment. Their red blood cell fatty acids content was determined, and at the end of the 8-week trial treatment responders and non-responders were identified. Findings affirmed the existing knowledge that depressive symptoms are strongly associated with PUFA status. Patients who did not respond to treatment showed low levels of Omega-3 and an unfavourable ratio of Omega-3 to Omega-6 at the start of treatment. Higher levels of Omega-3 fatty acid of DHA seemed to produce a better clinical response to treatments than the Omega-3 of EPA. The authors discussed some potential mechanisms and suggested that PUFA intake and metabolism could be a potential tool for the management of treatment-unresponsive patients with depression. This review highlights the clinical importance of considering PUFA status and metabolism in the support of major depressive disorders.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Healthy eating such as that with low omega-6 diets has more than a physiological result on the human body and carries significant biochemical consequences when the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio is deemed to be ‘high’.
- The result of this research has pharmaceutical implications - if the findings could be imparted to the general public in layman’s terms, practitioners could empower individuals to take greater control of their mental health through more naturalistic means, i.e., optimised nutrition.
- There are wider cognitive considerations of healthy eating beyond that of treating Major Depressive Disorder due to implicated blood-brain-barrier effects, as concluded in this study.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Sixty adults suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited into a multicenter study assessing the impact of baseline polyunsaturated (PUFA) levels on responsiveness to antidepressants. Neuropsychiatric evaluations producing MADRS (Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) scores at baseline, four weeks and again at eight weeks, were performed. The pre-recorded baseline PUFA levels were then used as an associative and predictive indicator when viewing the end point scoring of participants, thus categorising into responsive and nonresponsive strata.
Of those with low omega-3 and high omega-6 to omega-3 ratio at baseline, there was increased association with ‘non-responsive’ classification at end point (week 8). Participants were deemed ‘non-responsive’ to anti-depressant treatment when scores at week 8 failed to demonstrate ≥50% reduction in MADRS scoring.
Clinical practice applications:
- Clinicians could monitor MDD within at-risk-groups, such as those who are overweight (mean BMI of ALL study participants was 24.20 kg/m2 with a standard deviation of 4.21) or those experiencing an inflammatory state with blood-brain-barrier involvement, as part of a mental ill-health prevention programme.
- When presenting with symptoms of major depressive disorder and prescribing antidepressants, clinicians could recommend increasing consumption of foods high in omega-3 and/or querying the patient about their dietary habits.
- Article supports recommendations for an increase in the consumption of omega-3 rich foods amongst the general population to prevent or intervene in cases of major depressive disorder.
- Wider cognitive implications beyond major depressive disorder in the presence of low omega-3, such as cognitive decline as seen with dementia, theorised due to altered blood-brain-barrier (Cussotto et al., 2022; Gustafson et al., 2020).
Considerations for future research:
- Repeated studies, with normalised distribution of antidepressant and sample size by country, with greater geographic inclusion, along with age categorisation. The broader geographic inclusion is necessary to rule out cultural diets as a confounding variable. An example of how different cultural diets could influence the results, which has potentially been highlighted in this study, is the more predominant consumption of a Mediterranean diet which may have been the case for the participants from Spain or, as could also be the case, an underlying vitamin D deficiency of the participants from Germany.
- Novel studies for assessing diet against mood could be beneficial to fully apply the findings of this study to clinical practice applications and that of the practice of nutritional therapists. The thinking here is the potential for anti-inflammatory foods inducing better mood results through gut-brain axis links and resultant influence on microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by a high rate of treatment resistance. Omega (ω)-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) were shown to correlate with depressive phenotype both in rodents and in humans. However, few studies to date have investigated the role of PUFAs in antidepressant response. The primary aim of this study was to assess the link between baseline PUFA composition and changes in depressive symptoms as well as antidepressant response in a multicenter study of depressed patients. METHODS Sixty depressed adults who met criteria for MDD according to DSM-IV-TR were recruited. Neuropsychiatric evaluations occurred at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with standard antidepressants, including escitalopram (N = 45), sertraline (N = 13) and venlafaxine (N = 2). At study endpoint, patients were stratified into responders (R) or non-responders (NR) based on their MADRS (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) score. Baseline PUFA levels were assessed and their association with clinical response was determined. RESULTS Lower ω-3 PUFA levels were associated to worse baseline symptomatology. Baseline levels of PUFAs were significantly different between R and NR, with R exhibiting lower docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and ω-3 index; and higher ω-6/ω-3 ratio than NR before the start of antidepressant treatment. DHA levels as well as the ω-3 index and ω-6/ω-3 ratio significantly predicted response to antidepressants at study endpoint. CONCLUSIONS These results show that baseline levels of PUFAs predict later response to standard antidepressants in depressed subjects. They suggest that PUFA intake and/or metabolism represent a novel modifiable tool for the management of unresponsive depressed patients.
-
5.
Neuromodulation Treatments of Pathological Anxiety in Anxiety Disorders, Stressor-Related Disorders, and Major Depressive Disorder: A Dimensional Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Florian, G, Singier, A, Aouizerate, B, Salvo, F, Bienvenu, TCM
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2022;:910897
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathological anxiety is responsible for major functional impairments and resistance to conventional treatments in anxiety disorders (ADs), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Focal neuromodulation therapies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are being developed to treat those disorders. METHODS We performed a dimensional systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence of the efficacy of TMS, tDCS and DBS in reducing anxiety symptoms across ADs, PTSD and MDD. Reports were identified through systematic searches in PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane library (inception to November 2020), followed by review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Controlled clinical trials examining the effectiveness of brain stimulation techniques on generic anxiety symptoms in patients with ADs, PTSD or MDD were selected. RESULTS Nineteen studies (RCTs) met inclusion criteria, which included 589 participants. Overall, focal brain activity modulation interventions were associated with greater reduction of anxiety levels than controls [SMD: -0.56 (95% CI, -0.93 to-0.20, I 2 = 77%]. Subgroup analyses revealed positive effects for TMS across disorders, and of focal neuromodulation in generalized anxiety disorder and PTSD. Rates of clinical responses and remission were higher in the active conditions. However, the risk of bias was high in most studies. CONCLUSIONS There is moderate quality evidence for the efficacy of neuromodulation in treating pathological anxiety. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=233084, identifier: PROSPERO CRD42021233084. It was submitted on January 29th, 2021, and registered on March 1st, 2021. No amendment was made to the recorded protocol. A change was applied for the subgroup analyses based on target brain regions, we added the putative nature (excitatory/inhibitory) of brain activity modulation.
-
6.
A Delphi-method-based consensus guideline for definition of treatment-resistant depression for clinical trials.
Sforzini, L, Worrell, C, Kose, M, Anderson, IM, Aouizerate, B, Arolt, V, Bauer, M, Baune, BT, Blier, P, Cleare, AJ, et al
Molecular psychiatry. 2022;(3):1286-1299
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Criteria for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and partially responsive depression (PRD) as subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) are not unequivocally defined. In the present document we used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to define TRD and PRD and to serve as operational criteria for future clinical studies, especially if conducted for regulatory purposes. We reviewed the literature and brought together a group of international experts (including clinicians, academics, researchers, employees of pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies representatives, and one person with lived experience) to evaluate the state-of-the-art and main controversies regarding the current classification. We then provided recommendations on how to design clinical trials, and on how to guide research in unmet needs and knowledge gaps. This report will feed into one of the main objectives of the EUropean Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms, Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU-PEARL, IMI) MDD project, to design a protocol for platform trials of new medications for TRD/PRD.
-
7.
High S100B Levels Predict Antidepressant Response in Patients With Major Depression Even When Considering Inflammatory and Metabolic Markers.
Navinés, R, Oriolo, G, Horrillo, I, Cavero, M, Aouizerate, B, Schaefer, M, Capuron, L, Meana, JJ, Martin-Santos, R
The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;(6):468-478
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between antidepressant response and glial, inflammatory, and metabolic markers is poorly understood in depression. This study assessed the ability of biological markers to predict antidepressant response in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS We included 31 MDD outpatients treated with escitalopram or sertraline for 8 consecutive weeks. The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was administered at baseline and at week 4 and 8 of treatment. Concomitantly, blood samples were collected for the determination of serum S100B, C-reactive protein (CRP), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)-C levels. Treatment response was defined as ≥50% improvement in the MADRS score from baseline to either week 4 or 8. Variables associated with treatment response were included in a linear regression model as predictors of treatment response. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients (87%) completed 8 weeks of treatment; 74% and 63% were responders at week 4 and 8, respectively. High S100B and low HDL-C levels at baseline were associated with better treatment response at both time points. Low CRP levels were correlated with better response at week 4. Multivariate analysis showed that high baseline S100B levels and low baseline HDL-C levels were good predictors of treatment response at week 4 (R2 = 0.457, P = .001), while S100B was at week 8 (R2 = 0.239, P = .011). Importantly, baseline S100B and HDL-C levels were not associated with depression severity and did not change over time with clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS Serum S100B levels appear to be a useful biomarker of antidepressant response in MDD even when considering inflammatory and metabolic markers.
-
8.
Confirmations, advances and recommendations for the daily care of schizophrenia based on the French national FACE-SZ cohort.
Fond, G, Godin, O, Schürhoff, F, Berna, F, André, M, Aouizerate, B, Capdevielle, D, Chereau, I, D' Amato, T, Dubertret, C, et al
Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry. 2020;:109927
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National FondaMental Centers of Expertise (FACE) for Schizophrenia (SZ) have been created to shorten the gap between research and clinical practice. OBJECTIVES To synthetize in a review the 10-year findings issued from the FACE-SZ cohort analyses. METHODS More than 1000 patients were evaluated in 10 expert centers since 2010 with a 2-day long comprehensive standardized battery including neuropsychological testes and physical health assessment and followed-up for 3 years. RESULTS 1. The phase 0 cross-sectional analyses have confirmed well-known data: over-prescription of first-generation antipsychotics, antipsychotic polytherapy and long-term benzodiazepine and under-prescription of clozapine, 13% of drug-induced parkinsonism, 18% of akathisia, a mean duration of untreated psychosis of 18 months, one third of poorly-adherent patients, 24% of metabolic syndrome and 52% of current tobacco smokers with poor care for physical illnesses; a yearly mean financial cost of 15,000 euro/patient. 2. FACE-SZ also yielded additional data in insufficiently explored area: a half of major depression issues (among them one third of undiagnosed major depression and 44% of treated patients with unremitted depression), major depression having a strong impact on Quality of Life independently of negative symptoms, 22% of moderated to severe untreated physical pain. 3. FACE-SZ has explored emerging fields of research, including development of 4 stages- model of schizophrenia, chronic low-grade peripheral inflammation, latent Toxoplasma infection, hypovitaminosis D, and a model for relapse prediction at 2 years. DISCUSSION The associated factors and implications for public health programs were discussed. Based on the FACE-SZ findings and literature, the FACE-SZ group has yielded recommendations to improve daily care for schizophrenia and for future research.
-
9.
Clinical guidelines for the management of treatment-resistant depression: French recommendations from experts, the French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology and the fondation FondaMental.
Bennabi, D, Charpeaud, T, Yrondi, A, Genty, JB, Destouches, S, Lancrenon, S, Alaïli, N, Bellivier, F, Bougerol, T, Camus, V, et al
BMC psychiatry. 2019;(1):262
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clear guidance for successive antidepressant pharmacological treatments for non-responders in major depression is not well established. METHOD Based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, the French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology and the fondation FondaMental developed expert consensus guidelines for the management of treatment-resistant depression. The expert guidelines combine scientific evidence and expert clinicians' opinions to produce recommendations for treatment-resistant depression. A written survey comprising 118 questions related to highly-detailed clinical presentations was completed on a risk-benefit scale ranging from 0 to 9 by 36 psychiatrist experts in the field of major depression and its treatments. Key-recommendations are provided by the scientific committee after data analysis and interpretation of the results of the survey. RESULTS The scope of these guidelines encompasses the assessment of pharmacological resistance and situations at risk of resistance, as well as the pharmacological and psychological strategies in major depression. CONCLUSION The expert consensus guidelines will contribute to facilitate treatment decisions for clinicians involved in the daily assessment and management of treatment-resistant depression across a number of common and complex clinical situations.
-
10.
Clinical guidelines for the management of depression with specific comorbid psychiatric conditions French recommendations from experts (the French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology and the fondation FondaMental).
Bennabi, D, Yrondi, A, Charpeaud, T, Genty, JB, Destouches, S, Lancrenon, S, Allaili, N, Bellivier, F, Bougerol, T, Camus, V, et al
BMC psychiatry. 2019;(1):50
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommendations for pharmacological treatments of major depression with specific comorbid psychiatric conditions are lacking. METHOD The French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology and the fondation FondaMental developed expert consensus guidelines for the management of depression based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriatneness Method. Recommendations for lines of treatment are provided by the scientific committee after data analysis and interpretation of the results of a survey of 36 psychiatrist experts in the field of major depression and its treatments. RESULTS The expert guidelines combine scientific evidence and expert clinician's opinion to produce recommendations for major depression with comorbid anxiety disorders, personality disorders or substance use disorders and in geriatric depression. CONCLUSION These guidelines provide direction addressing common clinical dilemmas that arise in the pharmacologic treatment of major depression with comorbid psychiatric conditions.